TMAT vs. KROP
Compare and contrast key facts about Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP).
TMAT and KROP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMAT is a passively managed fund by Main Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2021. KROP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. Both TMAT and KROP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TMAT vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMAT vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | -5.56% | 20.06% | 27.20% | 32.32% | -39.29% | -10.62% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 15.06% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 15.06% return.
TMAT
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -13.53%
- 1Y
- 32.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
KROP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- 1Y
- 18.33%
- 3Y*
- -5.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMAT vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMAT vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
TMAT
KROP
TMAT vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAT | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.96 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.41 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.78 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 4.21 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAT | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.96 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | -0.60 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAT and KROP is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TMAT vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than KROP's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.20% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.37% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
TMAT vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and KROP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAT | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -61.96% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -11.29% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.51% | -49.60% | +32.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -44.32% | +11.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.77% | 4.78% | +3.99% |
Volatility
TMAT vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 5.19%. This indicates that TMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMAT | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 5.19% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 12.34% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.80% | 19.33% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.49% | 22.43% | +8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 22.43% | +8.35% |