TMAT vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TMAT tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMAT returned 28.88%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for KROP. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMAT charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

TMAT vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.34% return.

TMAT

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 14.89%
• YTD: 23.07%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 44.13%
• 3Y*: 28.88%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 0.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAT vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF	23.07%	20.06%	27.20%	32.32%	-39.29%	-10.62%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.34%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAT and KROP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between TMAT and KROP has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TMAT vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMAT	KROP
Technology	50.5%	-
Industrials	26.2%	39.7%
Basic Materials	9.1%	32.1%
Healthcare	8.9%	0.3%
Utilities	2.5%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Financial Services	2.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	0.3%
Energy	0.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	26.3%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TMAT vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAT

TMAT Risk / Return Rank: 44
TMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
TMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
TMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 32

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 24
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAT vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMAT	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	0.86	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.31	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.16	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	1.22	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	2.75	+2.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMAT vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAT and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMAT	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	0.86	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	-0.57	+0.71

Drawdowns

TMAT vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMAT	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-61.96%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.63%	-11.29%	-10.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.42%	-28.70%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-49.05%	+48.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.21%	-44.50%	+12.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.21%	4.99%	+4.22%

Volatility

TMAT vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.77%. This indicates that TMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMAT	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.33%	4.77%	+2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.97%	12.01%	+4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.27%	16.04%	+8.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.53%	22.28%	+8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.62%	22.28%	+8.34%

TMAT vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMAT vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than KROP's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.35%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMAT and KROP in my portfolio?

TMAT and KROP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMAT or KROP?

TMAT has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAT dropped -58.55% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, TMAT or KROP?

On 3-year performance, TMAT leads with 28.88% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMAT or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, TMAT has performed better with a 28.88% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMAT or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TMAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMAT or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.02% for TMAT.

What is the main difference between TMAT and KROP?

TMAT tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Main Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TMAT and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.