TMAR vs. BNO
TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - TMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TMAR returned 28.83% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TMAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
TMAR vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAR achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.
TMAR
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
TMAR vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March | 14.45% | 14.71% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAR and BNO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | -0.21 |
The correlation between TMAR and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAR vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
TMAR
BNO
TMAR vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAR | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.38 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.95 | 5.17 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.42 | 9.76 | +28.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAR | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 2.23 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.25 | 0.14 | +2.11 |
Drawdowns
TMAR vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.93%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAR and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAR | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -87.06% | +77.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -17.87% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -10.29% | +9.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -40.17% | +39.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 9.45% | -8.70% |
Volatility
TMAR vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) is 4.53%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that TMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAR | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 14.22% | -9.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 36.10% | -27.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47% | 41.46% | -31.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 35.38% | -23.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 36.68% | -25.26% |
TMAR vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAR vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither TMAR nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAR and BNO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to TMAR (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAR dropped -9.93% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs 28.83% for TMAR. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, TMAR has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs 28.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.
TMAR and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. TMAR tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TMAR and 0.90% for BNO.
TMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMAR and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer