TLYIX vs. FRQHX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX).
TLYIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. FRQHX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.
Performance
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLYIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund | -1.23% | 17.02% | 11.83% | 17.24% | -16.30% | 13.19% | 15.53% | 7.58% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 0.30% | 10.01% | 4.68% | 8.75% | -12.22% | 4.04% | 9.80% | 3.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLYIX achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than FRQHX's 0.30% return.
TLYIX
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
FRQHX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLYIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLYIX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank
TLYIX
FRQHX
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLYIX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.76 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 2.46 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.40 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 9.49 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLYIX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.76 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.72 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLYIX and FRQHX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison
TLYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than FRQHX's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLYIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund | 3.74% | 3.70% | 3.09% | 2.19% | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.03% | 2.26% | 2.73% | 0.15% | 2.56% | 0.27% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.35% | 3.20% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 5.25% | 6.22% | 3.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLYIX drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLYIX and FRQHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLYIX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -16.90% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -3.41% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.24% | -16.90% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -2.44% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.88% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 0.86% | +0.95% |
Volatility
TLYIX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.11%. This indicates that TLYIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLYIX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.11% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 2.93% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 4.65% | +6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 5.52% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 5.77% | +6.68% |