PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTX vs. BESF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTX vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 13.94% return.


TLTX

1D
0.82%
1M
2.89%
YTD
1.95%
6M
1.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BESF

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
13.94%
6M
13.42%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTX vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
1.95%6.02%
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
13.94%30.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTX and BESF is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTX vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BESF
BESF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTX vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTXBESFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.92

TLTX vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTX vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and BESF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTXBESFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-10.97%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-10.44%

+8.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-2.77%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

Volatility

TLTX vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTXBESFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

24.70%

-15.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.28%

24.43%

-15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.28%

24.43%

-15.15%

TLTX vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTX vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.11%, more than BESF's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
5.97%6.39%
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
17.11%7.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTX and BESF have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.11%, compared with 5.97% for BESF.

TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.80% for BESF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTX and BESF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer