PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTW vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTW vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.


TLTW

1D
0.18%
1M
2.22%
YTD
2.36%
6M
2.13%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
0.58%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTW vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
2.36%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.14%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%9.04%35.41%28.70%-7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and YCS is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTW vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTW vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTWYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.78

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

11.93

-7.57

TLTW vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTWYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-49.56%

+30.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-8.30%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

-23.05%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-0.14%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-19.87%

+11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.65%

-0.57%

Volatility

TLTW vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 1.66%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTWYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.25%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

12.19%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

16.93%

-9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

21.10%

-9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.33%

18.82%

-7.49%

TLTW vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTW vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.62%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTW and YCS have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to TLTW (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 18.37% vs 0.58% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 18.37% return vs 0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

TLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. TLTW tracks CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTW and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer