TLTW vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTW is a Options Trading fund tracking the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TLTW returned 10.46% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLTW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

TLTW vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.

TLTW

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: -0.20%
• 1Y: 10.46%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -18.50%
• YTD: -25.48%
• 6M: -29.84%
• 1Y: -38.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTW vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	1.21%	11.36%	-1.36%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-25.48%	-6.41%	99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and IBIT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.04

Return for Risk

TLTW vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW

TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 36
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTW vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLTW	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	-0.89	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	-1.23	+3.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.86	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	-0.79	+2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	-1.36	+6.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLTW vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTW	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	-0.89	+2.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.30	-0.33

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTW	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.61%	-49.36%	+30.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-49.36%	+43.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	-48.10%	+44.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-16.02%	+7.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	28.44%	-26.45%

Volatility

TLTW vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 2.48%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTW	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.48%	9.50%	-7.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.79%	34.44%	-28.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.70%	43.73%	-36.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.39%	50.19%	-38.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.39%	50.19%	-38.80%

TLTW vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTW vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	11.76%	14.82%	14.47%	19.59%	8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTW and IBIT in my portfolio?

TLTW and IBIT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTW or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to TLTW (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

Which ETF is better, TLTW or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, TLTW leads with 10.46% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTW or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, TLTW has performed better with a 10.46% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTW or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTW or IBIT?

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between TLTW and IBIT?

TLTW is categorized as Options Trading, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. TLTW tracks CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.