TLTW vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. TLTW is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, TLTW returned 6.79% vs 28.33% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TLTW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

TLTW vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 25.74% return.

TLTW

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -1.57%
• 6M: -0.27%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 1Y: 6.79%
• 3Y*: 0.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 21.60%
• YTD: 25.74%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTW vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	0.30%	11.36%	-0.85%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	25.74%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and DCMT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.21

The correlation between TLTW and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TLTW vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW

TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 29
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 29

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 51
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTW vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLTW	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.52	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	2.11	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.27	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.78	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.20	6.45	-3.26

TLTW vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTW	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.61%	-15.96%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-15.96%	+9.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.07%	-9.74%	+5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.09%	-3.51%	-4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	4.40%	-2.27%

Volatility

TLTW vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 2.33%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTW	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	6.10%	-3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.95%	16.86%	-10.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.62%	18.80%	-11.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.30%	16.03%	-4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.30%	16.03%	-4.73%

TLTW vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTW vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than DCMT's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.92%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	11.11%	14.82%	14.47%	19.59%	8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTW and DCMT in my portfolio?

TLTW and DCMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTW or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to TLTW (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, TLTW or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 28.33% vs 6.79% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTW or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTW or DCMT?

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTW or DCMT?

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.11%, compared with 2.92% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between TLTW and DCMT?

TLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.