PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTP vs. ICOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTP vs. ICOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than ICOI's -22.33% return.


TLTP

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.22%
6M
-0.63%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICOI

1D
-5.88%
1M
-10.04%
YTD
-22.33%
6M
-32.60%
1Y
-42.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTP vs. ICOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and ICOI is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTP vs. ICOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTP
TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTP vs. ICOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTPICOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.86

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

-0.73

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

-1.16

+4.36

TLTP vs. ICOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the ICOI Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and ICOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTPICOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

-0.86

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.50

+0.59

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. ICOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum ICOI drawdown of -58.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and ICOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTPICOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-58.10%

+49.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-58.10%

+52.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-55.30%

+52.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-27.43%

+24.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

36.48%

-34.36%

Volatility

TLTP vs. ICOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) is 2.40%, while Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) has a volatility of 13.92%. This indicates that TLTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTPICOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

13.92%

-11.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

34.93%

-29.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

49.40%

-41.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.84%

50.41%

-40.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.84%

50.41%

-40.57%

TLTP vs. ICOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTP vs. ICOI - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, less than ICOI's 338.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
338.05%247.40%0.00%
TLTP
Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF
13.16%12.53%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTP and ICOI have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOI has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to TLTP (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTP dropped -8.54% vs ICOI's -58.10%.

On 1-year performance, TLTP leads with 6.77% vs -42.41% for ICOI. On fees, TLTP is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TLTP has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLTP has performed better with a 6.77% return vs -42.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTP is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICOI.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 338.05%, compared with 13.16% for TLTP.

TLTP is categorized as Government Bonds, while ICOI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TLTP and 0.98% for ICOI.

TLTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTP and ICOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer