TLTP vs. GOVZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TLTP (Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF) and GOVZ (iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - TLTP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index while GOVZ tracks the ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TLTP returned 5.69% vs 4.27% for GOVZ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLTP charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GOVZ.

Performance

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than GOVZ's 3.57% return.

TLTP

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: 2.20%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOVZ

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: 6.77%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: -6.85%
• 5Y*: -11.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	2.20%	5.39%	-3.31%
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF	3.57%	-1.81%	-7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and GOVZ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.93

The correlation between TLTP and GOVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TLTP vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTP

TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 22
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 21
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GOVZ

GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 12
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLTP	GOVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.27	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.51	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.06	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	0.30	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	0.66	+1.92

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the GOVZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and GOVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and GOVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTP	GOVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-59.65%	+51.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-14.16%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-54.49%	+53.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-40.04%	+36.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	6.51%	-4.30%

Volatility

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) is 1.81%, while iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that TLTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTP	GOVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.81%	4.06%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.20%	10.91%	-5.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.41%	15.89%	-8.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.77%	23.88%	-14.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.77%	23.29%	-13.52%

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GOVZ's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTP vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%, more than GOVZ's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF	4.95%	5.00%	4.68%	3.84%	3.69%	1.76%	0.39%
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	12.91%	12.53%	2.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTP and GOVZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TLTP and GOVZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TLTP or GOVZ?

GOVZ has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to TLTP (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTP dropped -8.54% vs GOVZ's -59.65%.

Which ETF is better, TLTP or GOVZ?

On 1-year performance, TLTP leads with 5.69% vs 4.27% for GOVZ. On fees, GOVZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLTP has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTP or GOVZ?

Over the 1-year period, TLTP has performed better with a 5.69% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTP or GOVZ?

GOVZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TLTP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTP or GOVZ?

TLTP has the higher dividend yield at 12.91%, compared with 4.95% for GOVZ.

What is the main difference between TLTP and GOVZ?

TLTP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index, while GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TLTP and 0.15% for GOVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TLTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.