TLTIX vs. FRQIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX).
TLTIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. FRQIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007.
Performance
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund | -1.63% | 12.10% | 7.39% | 11.41% | -13.25% | 6.94% | 11.97% | 15.58% | -2.88% | 9.02% |
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | -0.50% | 9.97% | 4.48% | 8.52% | -12.39% | 3.82% | 9.58% | 12.63% | -2.84% | 10.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTIX achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FRQIX's -0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTIX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 5.69%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.73% annualized return.
TLTIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
FRQIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TLTIX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank
TLTIX
FRQIX
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLTIX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.56 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 2.17 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.10 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 8.45 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLTIX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.56 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.45 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.89 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.53 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTIX and FRQIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison
TLTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than FRQIX's 3.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund | 6.55% | 6.44% | 6.57% | 3.44% | 3.48% | 4.81% | 2.36% | 2.34% | 3.11% | 0.18% | 2.29% | 0.23% |
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.07% | 3.14% | 2.97% | 2.75% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 3.51% | 3.14% | 5.60% | 16.32% | 2.43% | 4.08% |
Drawdowns
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTIX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTIX and FRQIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTIX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -38.01% | +19.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.59% | -3.43% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.15% | -17.04% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.15% | -17.04% | -1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -3.17% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -4.47% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.85% | +0.23% |
Volatility
TLTIX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.95%. This indicates that TLTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLTIX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 1.95% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.76% | 2.85% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.34% | 4.61% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 5.52% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 5.33% | +2.19% |