PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTE vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTE vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 29.65% return.


TLTE

1D
-0.85%
1M
-7.10%
6M
8.31%
YTD
14.45%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
8.12%

KEMX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-8.36%
6M
21.66%
YTD
29.65%
1Y
52.14%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTE vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
14.45%30.21%3.53%13.62%-17.31%4.79%12.10%0.65%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
29.65%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTE and KEMX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.89

The correlation between TLTE and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTE vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTE
KEMX

Technology

33.5%
46.8%

Financial Services

17.7%
18.7%

Industrials

10.5%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

7.0%
7.6%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

4.1%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.6%

Energy

3.7%
4.0%

Utilities

2.9%
1.7%

Healthcare

2.8%
1.5%

Technology

TLTE
33.5%
KEMX
46.8%

Financial Services

TLTE
17.7%
KEMX
18.7%

Industrials

TLTE
10.5%
KEMX
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTE
9.9%
KEMX
5.5%

Basic Materials

TLTE
7.0%
KEMX
7.6%

Communication Services

TLTE
4.2%
KEMX
2.9%

Real Estate

TLTE
4.1%
KEMX
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

TLTE
3.7%
KEMX
2.6%

Energy

TLTE
3.7%
KEMX
4.0%

Utilities

TLTE
2.9%
KEMX
1.7%

Healthcare

TLTE
2.8%
KEMX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTE vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTE
TLTE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TLTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTE vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTEKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.41

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

11.68

-4.76

TLTE vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTE and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTE vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTEKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.21%

-38.80%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-15.36%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-19.62%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

-30.85%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-11.76%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.09%

-8.80%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

4.48%

-0.65%

Volatility

TLTE vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) is 8.82%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that TLTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTEKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

10.16%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

24.25%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.84%

26.15%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

19.21%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

21.42%

-2.78%

TLTE vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTE vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than KEMX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.53%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
3.42%3.76%3.73%4.03%4.42%3.21%1.95%3.23%3.02%2.12%2.30%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TLTE and KEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KEMX has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to TLTE (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 12.26% vs 6.74% for TLTE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TLTE has been the lower-risk option at 8.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TLTE.

TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.53% for KEMX.

TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTE and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer