TLTD vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. TLTD is passively managed, while WBIF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLTD returned 9.50%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for WBIF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTD charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

TLTD vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTD has outperformed WBIF with an annualized return of 9.50%, while WBIF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.52% annualized return.

TLTD

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 11.89%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 9.50%

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTD vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt	8.45%	39.69%	4.78%	17.19%	-13.74%	12.84%	4.21%	21.26%	-17.57%	26.27%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	3.43%	0.49%	-8.38%	16.56%	-2.71%	2.68%	-4.68%	19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and WBIF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014	0.63

The correlation between TLTD and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTD vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TLTD	WBIF
Financial Services	32.7%	31.0%
Industrials	13.5%	14.6%
Technology	10.3%	19.9%
Energy	7.7%	2.9%
Basic Materials	7.4%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	11.1%
Healthcare	4.2%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	3.1%
Utilities	3.3%	10.3%
Communication Services	2.0%	2.6%
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

TLTD vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTD

TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 51
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTD vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLTD	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.88	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.73	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	3.50	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	12.53	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLTD vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTD	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.88	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.19	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.45	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.30	+0.21

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTD	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.62%	-20.29%	-20.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.11%	-6.60%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.10%	-17.16%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.96%	-20.29%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.62%	-20.29%	-20.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-0.97%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-7.74%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	1.84%	+1.31%

Volatility

TLTD vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) at 4.13%. This indicates that TLTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTD	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.13%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	8.63%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	12.31%	+2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	12.86%	+3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	12.34%	+4.47%

TLTD vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTD vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt	3.08%	3.44%	3.88%	3.39%	2.76%	3.44%	2.04%	3.46%	3.16%	2.71%	2.93%	2.56%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTD and WBIF in my portfolio?

TLTD and WBIF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTD or WBIF?

TLTD has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, TLTD or WBIF?

On 10-year performance, TLTD leads with 9.50% vs 5.52% for WBIF. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTD or WBIF?

Over the 10-year period, TLTD has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTD or WBIF?

TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTD or WBIF?

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between TLTD and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.