PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTD vs. SPGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTD vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTD has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 10.09%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


TLTD

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.21%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.09%

SPGM

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
10.79%
6M
9.88%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTD vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
7.09%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%21.26%-17.57%26.27%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
10.79%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and SPGM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2012

0.78

The correlation between TLTD and SPGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTD vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTD
SPGM

Financial Services

24.4%
15.7%

Industrials

19.0%
12.5%

Basic Materials

10.7%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.0%

Technology

7.8%
30.7%

Energy

6.6%
4.0%

Healthcare

6.0%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.2%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.8%

Utilities

3.1%
2.0%

Financial Services

TLTD
24.4%
SPGM
15.7%

Industrials

TLTD
19.0%
SPGM
12.5%

Basic Materials

TLTD
10.7%
SPGM
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTD
10.2%
SPGM
9.0%

Technology

TLTD
7.8%
SPGM
30.7%

Energy

TLTD
6.6%
SPGM
4.0%

Healthcare

TLTD
6.0%
SPGM
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

TLTD
5.4%
SPGM
4.5%

Communication Services

TLTD
3.5%
SPGM
8.2%

Real Estate

TLTD
3.3%
SPGM
1.8%

Utilities

TLTD
3.1%
SPGM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTD vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTD vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTDSPGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.00

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

13.18

-5.35

TLTD vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and SPGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTDSPGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-33.97%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-9.50%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-16.90%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

-25.93%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-33.97%

-6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-2.70%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-4.79%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.16%

+1.05%

Volatility

TLTD vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.58%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTDSPGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.64%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

11.44%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

13.74%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

16.16%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

17.50%

-0.92%

TLTD vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTD vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than SPGM's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.83%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.42%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTD and SPGM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to TLTD (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 13.23% vs 10.09% for TLTD. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TLTD.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.83% for SPGM.

TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.09% for SPGM.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTD and SPGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer