PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTD vs. IQDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTD vs. IQDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than IQDF's 16.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TLTD having a 9.84% annualized return and IQDF not far behind at 9.43%.


TLTD

1D
0.36%
1M
2.49%
6M
5.50%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
27.13%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
8.38%

IQDF

1D
0.20%
1M
1.87%
6M
8.81%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
9.43%
ALL TIME*
7.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.03M$2.46M$2.15M
$470.57K$675.01K$784.22K

TLTD vs. IQDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
11.20%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%21.26%-17.57%26.27%
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
16.72%35.42%6.62%20.10%-14.69%10.18%3.54%20.96%-17.39%23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and IQDF is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013

0.91

The correlation between TLTD and IQDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTD vs. IQDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTD
IQDF

Financial Services

25.3%
27.9%

Industrials

17.2%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
5.8%

Basic Materials

9.7%
7.5%

Technology

6.7%
19.1%

Healthcare

6.1%
5.2%

Energy

5.7%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.3%

Real Estate

3.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

3.1%
3.0%

Financial Services

TLTD
25.3%
IQDF
27.9%

Industrials

TLTD
17.2%
IQDF
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTD
10.2%
IQDF
5.8%

Basic Materials

TLTD
9.7%
IQDF
7.5%

Technology

TLTD
6.7%
IQDF
19.1%

Healthcare

TLTD
6.1%
IQDF
5.2%

Energy

TLTD
5.7%
IQDF
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

TLTD
5.0%
IQDF
5.3%

Real Estate

TLTD
3.6%
IQDF
3.0%

Communication Services

TLTD
3.5%
IQDF
3.6%

Utilities

TLTD
3.1%
IQDF
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTD vs. IQDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IQDF
IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTD vs. IQDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTDIQDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.35

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

12.57

-4.22

TLTD vs. IQDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IQDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and IQDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. IQDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, roughly equal to the maximum IQDF drawdown of -39.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and IQDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTDIQDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-39.83%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-10.03%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-13.92%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

-29.31%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-39.83%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.71%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-9.24%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.67%

+0.59%

Volatility

TLTD vs. IQDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.05%, while FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTDIQDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

5.06%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

14.08%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

15.95%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

15.79%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.51%

+0.03%

TLTD vs. IQDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDF's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTD vs. IQDF - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than IQDF's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
2.99%3.27%6.72%6.06%5.59%4.13%3.31%4.46%5.78%3.89%3.75%4.27%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.29%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTD and IQDF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDF has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to TLTD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs IQDF's -39.83%.

On 10-year performance, TLTD leads with 9.84% vs 9.43% for IQDF. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TLTD has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.99% for IQDF.

TLTD is categorized as Global Equities, while IQDF is Quality Factor. TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.47% for IQDF.

IQDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTD and IQDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer