PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTD vs. INFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTD vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 17.21% return.


TLTD

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.60%
YTD
8.45%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
9.50%

INFL

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
17.21%
6M
17.82%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTD vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
8.45%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%9.65%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
17.21%18.30%23.34%1.62%2.65%24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and INFL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between TLTD and INFL has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TLTD vs. INFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTD
INFL

Financial Services

32.7%
21.1%

Industrials

13.5%
1.8%

Technology

10.3%

-

Energy

7.7%
40.5%

Basic Materials

7.4%
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%

-

Healthcare

4.2%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.4%

Utilities

3.3%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
0.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.1%

Financial Services

TLTD
32.7%
INFL
21.1%

Industrials

TLTD
13.5%
INFL
1.8%

Technology

TLTD
10.3%
INFL

-

Energy

TLTD
7.7%
INFL
40.5%

Basic Materials

TLTD
7.4%
INFL
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTD
5.6%
INFL

-

Healthcare

TLTD
4.2%
INFL
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

TLTD
3.5%
INFL
2.4%

Utilities

TLTD
3.3%
INFL
2.9%

Communication Services

TLTD
2.0%
INFL
0.3%

Real Estate

TLTD
0.9%
INFL
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTD vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTD vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTDINFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.81

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

7.68

+0.81

TLTD vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTDINFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.52

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.75

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.91

-0.39

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than INFL's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and INFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTDINFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-21.30%

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-8.36%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-15.56%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

-21.30%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-5.51%

+3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-5.10%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.06%

+0.09%

Volatility

TLTD vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 3.60%. This indicates that TLTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTDINFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.60%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

12.32%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

15.52%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

17.71%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

17.64%

-0.83%

TLTD vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTD vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than INFL's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.91%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.08%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTD and INFL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTD has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to INFL (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs INFL's -21.30%.

On 5-year performance, INFL leads with 13.12% vs 9.51% for TLTD. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INFL has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.91% for INFL.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.85% for INFL.

TLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTD and INFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer