TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (TLT5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L).

TLT5.L and 3NIE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TLT5.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on May 15, 2023. 3NIE.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021.

Performance

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (TLT5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TLT5.L Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities	-10.87%	-13.06%
3NIE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities	-0.49%	-21.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT5.L achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly lower than 3NIE.L's -0.49% return.

TLT5.L

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -21.21%
• YTD: -10.87%
• 6M: -21.42%
• 1Y: -38.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3NIE.L

• 1D: 22.29%
• 1M: 48.72%
• YTD: -0.49%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TLT5.L and 3NIE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

TLT5.L

Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities

3NIE.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities

Return for Risk

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT5.L

TLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
TLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (TLT5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLT5.L	3NIE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLT5.L	3NIE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	-0.31	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between TLT5.L and 3NIE.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TLT5.L nor 3NIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TLT5.L vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT5.L drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than 3NIE.L's maximum drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT5.L and 3NIE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLT5.L	3NIE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.31%	-60.65%	-23.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.75%	-22.81%	-60.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.62%	-39.27%	-24.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLT5.L	3NIE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.26%	164.78%	-106.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.12%	164.78%	-76.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.12%	164.78%	-76.66%