PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (TLT5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TLT5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities
-10.87%-26.09%-59.61%21.31%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-25.58%13.90%60.92%74.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT5.L achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly higher than 3QQQ.L's -25.58% return.


TLT5.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
-21.21%
YTD
-10.87%
6M
-21.42%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
1.95%
1M
-18.31%
YTD
-25.58%
6M
-22.67%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
35.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLT5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT5.L
TLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (TLT5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLT5.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

0.47

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.71

1.20

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.17

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

0.53

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.10

1.18

-2.27

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT5.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT5.L and 3QQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLT5.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

0.47

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.23

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between TLT5.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TLT5.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT5.L drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than 3QQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT5.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TLT5.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.31%

-58.93%

-25.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.16%

-47.89%

-1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.75%

-46.87%

-36.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.62%

-20.83%

-42.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.03%

21.60%

+16.43%

Volatility

TLT5.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (TLT5.L) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) at 14.12%. This indicates that TLT5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TLT5.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

14.12%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.39%

52.70%

-20.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.26%

69.95%

-11.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.12%

63.74%

+24.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.12%

63.74%

+24.38%