TLSTX vs. RESGX
TLSTX (TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TLSTX returned 11.63%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TLSTX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.
Performance
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLSTX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 22.24% return.
TLSTX
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.50%
RESGX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 16.73%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 34.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLSTX TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund | 9.68% | 17.08% | 23.66% | 25.90% | -19.24% | 25.61% | 20.74% | 15.48% |
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio | 22.24% | 10.30% | 11.40% | 15.59% | -14.71% | 26.58% | 9.57% | 11.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLSTX and RESGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TLSTX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLSTX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank
TLSTX
RESGX
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLSTX | RESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 4.06 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 12.85 | -3.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLSTX drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLSTX and RESGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLSTX | RESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.91% | -37.80% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -7.84% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -20.50% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -23.58% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -4.44% | +2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -4.98% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.50% | -0.46% |
Volatility
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) is 3.37%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that TLSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLSTX | RESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.62% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 11.33% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 14.97% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 17.31% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 18.65% | +1.31% |
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLSTX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLSTX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison
TLSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than RESGX's 6.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio | 6.97% | 8.24% | 13.38% | 9.08% | 8.17% | 9.98% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 5.09% | 0.94% | 0.72% |
TLSTX TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund | 5.00% | 5.48% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.82% | 1.38% | 1.84% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLSTX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RESGX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to TLSTX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLSTX dropped -34.91% vs RESGX's -37.80%.
RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLSTX and RESGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer