TLMIX vs. FGNSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLMIX (Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund) and FGNSX (Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TLMIX returned 1.60%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for FGNSX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLMIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FGNSX.

Performance

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLMIX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than FGNSX's 0.67% return.

TLMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 3.37%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: 1.60%
• 10Y*: 1.33%

FGNSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 3.21%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLMIX Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund	1.01%	3.74%	2.75%	3.25%	-2.46%	-0.05%	1.00%	2.12%	1.26%	0.09%
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund	0.67%	3.08%	3.47%	3.56%	-0.36%	0.14%	1.04%	2.11%	1.47%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TLMIX and FGNSX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017	0.48

Return for Risk

TLMIX vs. FGNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLMIX

TLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
TLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
TLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
TLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
TLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
TLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FGNSX

FGNSX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FGNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FGNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FGNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLMIX	FGNSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	3.00	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.86	7.47	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	2.83	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	6.18	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.26	27.73	-15.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the FGNSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLMIX and FGNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLMIX	FGNSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	3.00	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	1.05	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	1.10	0.00

Drawdowns

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLMIX drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, which is greater than FGNSX's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLMIX and FGNSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLMIX	FGNSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-2.35%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.00%	-0.50%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-2.35%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.15%	-2.35%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-0.25%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.92%	-0.64%

Volatility

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) at 0.40%. This indicates that TLMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLMIX	FGNSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.40%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.93%	0.69%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21%	1.02%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.37%	2.06%	-0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.16%	1.65%	-0.49%

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLMIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FGNSX's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLMIX vs. FGNSX - Dividend Comparison

TLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than FGNSX's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund	2.35%	2.63%	3.31%	2.57%	0.84%	0.34%	0.83%	1.79%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLMIX Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund	3.23%	3.25%	3.30%	2.34%	1.15%	0.44%	1.07%	1.45%	1.33%	0.99%	0.47%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLMIX and FGNSX in my portfolio?

TLMIX and FGNSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLMIX or FGNSX?

TLMIX has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to FGNSX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLMIX dropped -4.15% vs FGNSX's -2.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.