PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGNSX vs. PRINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and T. Rowe Price Summit Municipal Income Fund (PRINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGNSX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than PRINX's 2.38% return.


FGNSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.05%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*

PRINX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.95%
YTD
2.38%
6M
2.90%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGNSX
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund
0.77%3.08%3.47%3.56%-0.36%0.14%1.04%2.11%1.47%-0.10%
PRINX
T. Rowe Price Summit Municipal Income Fund
2.38%3.29%2.36%6.71%-11.67%3.16%4.60%7.81%0.40%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FGNSX and PRINX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.45

The correlation between FGNSX and PRINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGNSX vs. PRINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGNSX
FGNSX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FGNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FGNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PRINX
PRINX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PRINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and T. Rowe Price Summit Municipal Income Fund (PRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGNSXPRINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.83

1.67

+1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

2.85

+3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.60

10.10

+17.50

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGNSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the PRINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGNSX and PRINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGNSX drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum PRINX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGNSX and PRINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGNSXPRINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-16.27%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.50%

-2.90%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.35%

-6.67%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.35%

-16.27%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-2.18%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

0.81%

-0.70%

Volatility

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) is 0.28%, while T. Rowe Price Summit Municipal Income Fund (PRINX) has a volatility of 0.82%. This indicates that FGNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGNSXPRINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

0.82%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.65%

2.20%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02%

2.99%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

4.39%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.65%

4.29%

-2.64%

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGNSX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PRINX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGNSX vs. PRINX - Dividend Comparison

FGNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than PRINX's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGNSX
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund
2.34%2.63%3.31%2.57%0.84%0.34%0.83%1.79%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRINX
T. Rowe Price Summit Municipal Income Fund
3.68%3.63%2.78%2.46%1.96%2.14%2.64%2.87%3.12%3.19%3.32%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGNSX and PRINX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRINX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to FGNSX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGNSX dropped -2.35% vs PRINX's -16.27%.

FGNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGNSX and PRINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer