FGNSX vs. LISDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX).
FGNSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2017. LISDX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 30, 2008.
Performance
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund | -0.10% | 3.08% | 3.47% | 3.56% | -0.36% | 0.14% | 1.04% | 2.11% | 1.47% | -0.10% |
LISDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund | -0.18% | 4.44% | 3.11% | 3.14% | -4.38% | 0.55% | 2.18% | 4.43% | 1.30% | 0.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGNSX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than LISDX's -0.18% return.
FGNSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- —
LISDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGNSX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LISDX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGNSX vs. LISDX — Risk / Return Rank
FGNSX
LISDX
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGNSX | LISDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.83 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.73 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.59 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.15 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 8.75 | -6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGNSX | LISDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.83 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.79 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.24 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGNSX and LISDX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Dividend Comparison
FGNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than LISDX's 3.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund | 1.86% | 2.63% | 3.31% | 2.57% | 0.84% | 0.34% | 0.83% | 1.79% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LISDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund | 3.04% | 3.53% | 3.06% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.05% | 1.58% | 2.15% | 1.74% | 1.31% | 1.29% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGNSX drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum LISDX drawdown of -6.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGNSX and LISDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGNSX | LISDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -6.72% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -1.72% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.35% | -6.72% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -1.44% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -0.81% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.42% | +0.50% |
Volatility
FGNSX vs. LISDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) is 0.23%, while Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) has a volatility of 0.52%. This indicates that FGNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LISDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGNSX | LISDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 0.52% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 0.99% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 1.99% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.04% | 1.61% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 1.75% | -0.09% |