TLLIX vs. TSBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX).
TLLIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TSBIX is managed by TIAA Investments.
Performance
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | -1.74% | 20.75% | 15.17% | 20.53% | -17.52% | 17.12% | 17.20% | 26.04% | -7.05% | 19.20% |
TSBIX TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class | -0.18% | 8.69% | 3.32% | 6.05% | -14.43% | -1.03% | 7.43% | 8.94% | 0.08% | 4.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLLIX achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than TSBIX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TLLIX has outperformed TSBIX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while TSBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.17% annualized return.
TLLIX
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
TSBIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLLIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TSBIX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TLLIX vs. TSBIX — Risk / Return Rank
TLLIX
TSBIX
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLLIX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.64 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.12 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 6.29 | +1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLLIX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.12 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.45 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.56 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLLIX and TSBIX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Dividend Comparison
TLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than TSBIX's 4.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | 3.18% | 3.12% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 1.71% | 2.25% | 2.67% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 0.27% |
TSBIX TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.34% | 5.38% | 5.10% | 3.77% | 2.31% | 1.69% | 4.56% | 3.68% | 2.63% | 2.45% | 3.19% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLLIX drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, which is greater than TSBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLIX and TSBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLLIX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -19.21% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -2.82% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -19.21% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.41% | -19.21% | -12.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.38% | -2.17% | -4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -3.58% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 0.95% | +1.38% |
Volatility
TLLIX vs. TSBIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) at 1.50%. This indicates that TLLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLLIX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 1.50% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 2.52% | +6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 4.32% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 5.80% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 4.83% | +10.65% |