TLLIX vs. TISBX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX).
TLLIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TISBX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | -1.74% | 20.75% | 15.17% | 20.53% | -17.52% | 17.12% | 17.20% | 26.04% | -7.05% | 19.20% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 0.89% | 12.72% | 11.60% | 17.07% | -20.31% | 14.85% | 20.14% | 25.61% | -10.99% | 13.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLLIX achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than TISBX's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, TLLIX has outperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.
TLLIX
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
TISBX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLLIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLLIX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank
TLLIX
TISBX
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLLIX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.65 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.61 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 6.05 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLLIX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.16 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.42 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.36 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLLIX and TISBX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison
TLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than TISBX's 4.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | 3.18% | 3.12% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 1.71% | 2.25% | 2.67% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 0.27% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 4.09% | 4.12% | 6.82% | 3.09% | 1.97% | 8.96% | 2.65% | 5.16% | 9.29% | 4.49% | 4.03% | 4.77% |
Drawdowns
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLLIX drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLIX and TISBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLLIX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -56.50% | +25.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -13.90% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -31.89% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.41% | -41.69% | +10.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.38% | -7.88% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -9.74% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 3.70% | -1.37% |
Volatility
TLLIX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) is 5.56%, while TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that TLLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLLIX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 7.49% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 14.50% | -5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 23.37% | -8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 22.58% | -8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 23.39% | -7.91% |