TLH vs. ZTEN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN).
TLH and ZTEN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TLH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. ZTEN is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. Both TLH and ZTEN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TLH vs. ZTEN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLH vs. ZTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.24% | 6.47% | -0.09% |
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.45% | 9.15% | 0.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than ZTEN's -0.45% return.
TLH
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 1.31%
- 3Y*
- -0.20%
- 5Y*
- -3.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.67%
ZTEN
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLH vs. ZTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLH and ZTEN have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLH vs. ZTEN — Risk / Return Rank
TLH
ZTEN
TLH vs. ZTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLH | ZTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 1.04 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 1.46 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.82 | -1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 5.88 | -5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLH | ZTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 1.04 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.20 | -0.92 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLH and ZTEN is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLH vs. ZTEN - Dividend Comparison
TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than ZTEN's 5.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.59% | 5.16% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TLH vs. ZTEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than ZTEN's maximum drawdown of -3.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and ZTEN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLH | ZTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -3.43% | -37.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -3.42% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.63% | -2.06% | -27.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -0.69% | -9.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 1.06% | +2.24% |
Volatility
TLH vs. ZTEN - Volatility Comparison
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) at 2.59%. This indicates that TLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLH | ZTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 2.59% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 3.52% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 5.87% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 5.89% | +6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 5.89% | +5.30% |