PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLH vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLH vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, TLH has underperformed UUP with an annualized return of -1.18%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.12% annualized return.


TLH

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.05%
6M
-0.16%
YTD
0.09%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
1.79%
5Y*
-4.57%
10Y*
-1.18%

UUP

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.07%
6M
4.62%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLH vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.09%6.47%-4.21%4.03%-25.24%-5.38%13.78%10.11%0.37%4.21%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
4.77%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TLH and UUP is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TLH and UUP has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLH vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLH
TLH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLH Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLH vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLHUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.35

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

6.48

-5.00

TLH vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLH and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLH vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLHUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-22.19%

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-3.65%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-10.05%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

-10.37%

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

-14.24%

-26.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.40%

-1.89%

-27.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-8.89%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.32%

+1.19%

Volatility

TLH vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.52%. This indicates that TLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLHUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

1.52%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

4.35%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

6.03%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

7.22%

+5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

6.90%

+4.29%

TLH vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLH vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than UUP's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.47%4.17%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.27%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLH and UUP have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLH has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to UUP (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLH dropped -41.14% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, UUP leads with 3.12% vs -1.18% for TLH. On fees, TLH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UUP has performed better with a 3.12% return vs -1.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

TLH has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 3.27% for UUP.

TLH is categorized as Government Bonds, while UUP is Currency. TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLH and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLH and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer