TLH vs. IBIT
TLH (iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TLH returned 5.33% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
TLH vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
TLH
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -3.80%
- 10Y*
- -0.83%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLH vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.51% | 6.47% | -2.71% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLH and IBIT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLH vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
TLH
IBIT
TLH vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.86 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.79 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | -1.36 | +3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | -0.89 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
TLH vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -49.36% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -49.36% | +42.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.82% | -48.10% | +18.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -16.02% | +5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 28.44% | -26.09% |
Volatility
TLH vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) is 2.46%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that TLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 9.50% | -7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 34.44% | -28.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.01% | 43.73% | -35.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 50.19% | -37.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 50.19% | -39.00% |
TLH vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLH vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLH and IBIT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to TLH (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLH dropped -41.14% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, TLH leads with 5.33% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, TLH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLH has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TLH has performed better with a 5.33% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
TLH has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
TLH is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLH and 0.25% for IBIT.
TLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLH and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer