PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLH vs. GOVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLH vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than GOVZ's -0.58% return.


TLH

1D
0.18%
1M
0.38%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
0.67%
5Y*
-3.77%
10Y*
-0.78%

GOVZ

1D
0.36%
1M
0.98%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
-7.19%
5Y*
-11.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLH vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.33%6.47%-4.21%4.03%-25.24%-5.38%-3.45%
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
-0.58%-1.81%-16.24%0.90%-41.03%-4.86%-5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TLH and GOVZ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.96

The correlation between TLH and GOVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLH vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLH
TLH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLH Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLH vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLHGOVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.03

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.11

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

0.26

+1.48

TLH vs. GOVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the GOVZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLH and GOVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLHGOVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.10

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

-0.48

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.58

+0.86

Drawdowns

TLH vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and GOVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLHGOVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-59.65%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-14.16%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-28.72%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

-57.63%

+22.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.69%

-56.31%

+26.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-39.92%

+29.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

6.24%

-3.88%

Volatility

TLH vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) is 2.43%, while iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that TLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLHGOVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

4.15%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

10.51%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.01%

16.26%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

23.91%

-11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

23.34%

-12.15%

TLH vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TLH and GOVZ have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLH vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison

TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than GOVZ's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
5.16%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.47%4.17%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TLH and GOVZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOVZ has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to TLH (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLH dropped -41.14% vs GOVZ's -59.65%.

On 5-year performance, TLH leads with -3.77% vs -11.47% for GOVZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TLH has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TLH has performed better with a -3.77% return vs -11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLH and GOVZ have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 4.47% for TLH.

TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index.

TLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLH and GOVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer