TLH vs. BNDD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD).
TLH and BNDD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TLH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. BNDD is an actively managed fund by Quadratic. It was launched on Sep 16, 2021.
Performance
TLH vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLH vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.24% | 6.47% | -4.21% | 4.03% | -25.24% | -1.94% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.22% | -8.17% | -6.65% | 4.02% | -17.48% | 5.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 3.22% return.
TLH
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 1.31%
- 3Y*
- -0.20%
- 5Y*
- -3.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.67%
BNDD
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- -5.11%
- 3Y*
- -4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLH vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TLH vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
TLH
BNDD
TLH vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLH | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | -0.41 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | -0.48 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.94 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | -0.37 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | -0.56 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLH | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.41 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | -0.35 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLH and BNDD is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TLH vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than BNDD's 3.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.64% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TLH vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than BNDD's maximum drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and BNDD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLH | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -30.87% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -10.93% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.63% | -27.28% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -19.03% | +8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 7.26% | -3.96% |
Volatility
TLH vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) is 3.25%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that TLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLH | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 3.52% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 8.09% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 12.44% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 13.55% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 13.55% | -2.36% |