TLGAX vs. BIAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund (TLGAX) and Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX).
TLGAX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Oct 5, 2000. BIAFX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Nov 30, 2006.
Performance
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLGAX Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund | -3.15% | 11.60% | 22.24% | 24.16% | -21.44% | 29.00% | 22.21% | 30.73% | -11.48% | 16.90% |
BIAFX Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund | -10.43% | 9.74% | 23.72% | 34.52% | -21.07% | 24.95% | 19.89% | 42.29% | -4.15% | 24.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLGAX achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than BIAFX's -10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TLGAX has underperformed BIAFX with an annualized return of 11.48%, while BIAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.
TLGAX
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -7.80%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -4.44%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
BIAFX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -8.34%
- YTD
- -10.43%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- 1Y
- 1.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLGAX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAFX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TLGAX vs. BIAFX — Risk / Return Rank
TLGAX
BIAFX
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund (TLGAX) and Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLGAX | BIAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.12 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 0.30 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.02 | +1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | -0.06 | +5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLGAX | BIAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.12 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.72 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.46 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLGAX and BIAFX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Dividend Comparison
TLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.00%, more than BIAFX's 6.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLGAX Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.00% | 12.59% | 6.98% | 5.89% | 10.34% | 5.99% | 1.69% | 4.03% | 5.81% | 2.54% | 1.21% | 10.79% |
BIAFX Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund | 6.49% | 5.81% | 4.81% | 2.67% | 3.71% | 3.75% | 3.16% | 8.65% | 4.15% | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLGAX drawdown since its inception was -61.24%, roughly equal to the maximum BIAFX drawdown of -60.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLGAX and BIAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLGAX | BIAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.24% | -60.32% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -13.10% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.82% | -27.44% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.72% | -35.49% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -13.03% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -10.22% | -8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.72% | -1.03% |
Volatility
TLGAX vs. BIAFX - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund (TLGAX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX) at 4.86%. This indicates that TLGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLGAX | BIAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 4.86% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 9.90% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 18.53% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 17.79% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 19.15% | +0.34% |