PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAFX vs. BAFWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAFX achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than BAFWX's 7.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIAFX having a 15.37% annualized return and BAFWX not far ahead at 15.79%.


BIAFX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.23%
YTD
5.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
15.37%

BAFWX

1D
-0.16%
1M
9.41%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.03%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
15.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAFX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund
5.43%9.74%23.72%34.52%-21.07%24.95%19.89%42.29%-4.15%24.12%
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
7.08%3.35%20.35%39.07%-30.90%30.01%39.09%36.09%4.51%28.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAFX and BAFWX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.88

The correlation between BIAFX and BAFWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAFX vs. BAFWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAFX
BIAFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BIAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BAFWX
BAFWX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BAFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAFXBAFWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.65

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

0.98

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

0.54

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.90

1.41

+2.49

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the BAFWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAFX and BAFWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAFXBAFWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.65

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.74

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.80

-0.30

Drawdowns

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAFX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than BAFWX's maximum drawdown of -36.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAFX and BAFWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAFXBAFWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.32%

-36.86%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-19.93%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-25.03%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-36.86%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

-36.86%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.16%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-5.71%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

7.64%

-4.01%

Volatility

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX) is 2.68%, while Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that BIAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAFWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAFXBAFWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

4.49%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

13.16%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

16.55%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

22.62%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

21.51%

-2.33%

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BAFWX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAFX vs. BAFWX - Dividend Comparison

BIAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than BAFWX's 22.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
22.26%23.83%5.23%0.01%0.00%1.82%0.00%1.48%3.71%1.70%0.71%4.73%
BIAFX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund
5.51%5.81%4.81%2.67%3.71%3.75%3.16%8.65%4.15%0.42%0.44%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAFX and BAFWX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAFWX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to BIAFX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAFX dropped -60.32% vs BAFWX's -36.86%.

BIAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAFX and BAFWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer