PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLGAX vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund (TLGAX) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLGAX achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 24.57% return.


TLGAX

1D
0.59%
1M
5.50%
YTD
20.96%
6M
18.99%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
13.97%

BIBL

1D
-2.18%
1M
4.42%
YTD
24.57%
6M
23.10%
1Y
40.13%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLGAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund
20.96%11.60%22.24%24.16%-21.44%29.00%22.21%30.73%-11.48%2.77%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
24.57%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%29.68%-7.64%4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TLGAX and BIBL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017

0.91

The correlation between TLGAX and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLGAX vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLGAX
TLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund (TLGAX) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLGAXBIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

4.51

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

19.18

-6.15

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLGAX and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLGAX drawdown since its inception was -61.24%, which is greater than BIBL's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLGAX and BIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLGAXBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.24%

-36.12%

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-8.94%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.12%

-20.60%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.82%

-30.85%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-2.18%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-7.00%

-11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.10%

+0.33%

Volatility

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund (TLGAX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 6.91%. This indicates that TLGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLGAXBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

6.91%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.13%

13.67%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

16.47%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

19.76%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

21.11%

-1.39%

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLGAX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLGAX vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

TLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than BIBL's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.95%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%0.00%0.00%
TLGAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund
10.41%12.59%6.98%5.89%10.34%5.99%1.69%4.03%5.81%2.54%1.21%10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLGAX and BIBL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLGAX has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to BIBL (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLGAX dropped -61.24% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLGAX and BIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer