TLG vs. QARP
TLG (Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TLG is actively managed, while QARP is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLG charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
TLG vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLG
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
TLG vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLG Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF | 6.74% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLG and QARP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLG vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
TLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QARP
TLG vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLG vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLG drawdown since its inception was -9.38%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLG and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -35.44% | +26.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.33% | 0.00% | -7.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -4.39% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
TLG vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.11% | 10.58% | +12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 15.54% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 19.55% | +3.56% |
TLG vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLG has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLG vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
TLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
TLG Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLG and QARP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for TLG.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for TLG.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TLG and 0.19% for QARP.
Find the right allocation for TLG and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer