TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO
TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TLF.TO returned 32.76% vs 33.36% for CIAI.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLF.TO achieves a 21.68% return, which is significantly higher than CIAI.TO's 19.44% return.
TLF.TO
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- 6M
- 18.82%
- YTD
- 21.68%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 21.23%
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 21.68% | 18.20% | 12.74% |
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.44% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLF.TO and CIAI.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TLF.TO and CIAI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TLF.TO
CIAI.TO
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLF.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.77 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 4.87 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, which is greater than CIAI.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and CIAI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLF.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.19% | -31.22% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -18.93% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -10.02% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -6.43% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 6.87% | -2.53% |
Volatility
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.70% compared to CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) at 10.63%. This indicates that TLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIAI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLF.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.70% | 10.63% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.97% | 22.08% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.65% | 27.21% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 29.17% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 29.17% | -4.95% |
Dividends
TLF.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Dividend Comparison
TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, while CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 5.66% | 5.90% | 5.86% | 5.31% | 6.97% | 3.40% | 3.49% | 4.64% | 6.05% | 5.94% | 7.67% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLF.TO and CIAI.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and CI Investments.
Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and CIAI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer