PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDR vs. KNRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDR vs. KNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNRG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.59%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.76%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLDR vs. KNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLDR and KNRG is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDR vs. KNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLDR

KNRG
KNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
KNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLDR vs. KNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLDR vs. KNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLDRKNRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.54

2.81

+5.73

Drawdowns

TLDR vs. KNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.05%, smaller than the maximum KNRG drawdown of -2.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and KNRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDRKNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-2.71%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.33%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

Volatility

TLDR vs. KNRG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDRKNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40%

3.52%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.40%

3.52%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.40%

3.52%

-3.12%

TLDR vs. KNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KNRG's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLDR vs. KNRG - Dividend Comparison

TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than KNRG's 6.94% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLDR and KNRG have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KNRG.

KNRG has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 1.22% for TLDR.

TLDR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while KNRG is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 0.76% for KNRG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDR and KNRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer