KNRG vs. RSBT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KNRG (Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF) and RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KNRG returned 8.62% vs 23.34% for RSBT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KNRG charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RSBT.

Performance

KNRG vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNRG achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 5.80% return.

KNRG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBT

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 4.32%
• 1Y: 23.34%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNRG vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KNRG Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF	2.62%	7.38%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	5.80%	16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between KNRG and RSBT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

KNRG vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNRG

KNRG Risk / Return Rank: 86
KNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
KNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
KNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
KNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 54
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNRG vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KNRG	RSBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.60	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	2.06	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.30	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.71	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.22	9.31	+5.91

KNRG vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNRG and RSBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KNRG vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNRG drawdown since its inception was -2.71%, smaller than the maximum RSBT drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNRG and RSBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNRG	RSBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-23.60%	+20.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-6.33%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-4.39%	+4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-12.49%	+12.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	2.51%	-1.94%

Volatility

KNRG vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is 0.67%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that KNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNRG	RSBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	5.64%	-4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.18%	11.03%	-8.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10%	14.69%	-11.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	13.84%	-10.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	13.84%	-10.36%

KNRG vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNRG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

KNRG vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

KNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than RSBT's 3.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KNRG Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF	6.93%	4.22%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	3.03%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KNRG and RSBT in my portfolio?

KNRG and RSBT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KNRG or RSBT?

RSBT has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to KNRG (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNRG dropped -2.71% vs RSBT's -23.60%.

Which ETF is better, KNRG or RSBT?

On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 23.34% vs 8.62% for KNRG. On fees, KNRG is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, KNRG has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KNRG or RSBT?

Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 23.34% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KNRG or RSBT?

KNRG is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KNRG or RSBT?

KNRG has the higher dividend yield at 6.93%, compared with 3.03% for RSBT.

What is the main difference between KNRG and RSBT?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for KNRG and 0.97% for RSBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.