TLDR vs. TUSB
TLDR (The Laddered T-Bill ETF) and TUSB (Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
TLDR vs. TUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLDR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUSB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLDR vs. TUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.39% |
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDR and TUSB is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDR vs. TUSB — Risk / Return Rank
TLDR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TUSB
TLDR vs. TUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLDR | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 18.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 72.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLDR vs. TUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.05%, smaller than the maximum TUSB drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and TUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDR | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.51% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.06% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
TLDR vs. TUSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDR | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38% | 0.95% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 1.25% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 1.25% | -0.87% |
TLDR vs. TUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLDR and TUSB have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLDR vs. TUSB - Dividend Comparison
TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than TUSB's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.36% | 0.00% |
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.26% | 3.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDR and TUSB have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLDR and TUSB have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
TUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.36% for TLDR.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Thrivent.
Find the right allocation for TLDR and TUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer