TLDR vs. IGHG
TLDR (The Laddered T-Bill ETF) and IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - TLDR is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by REX Shares, while IGHG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. TLDR is actively managed, while IGHG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. TLDR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IGHG.
Performance
TLDR vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLDR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
TLDR vs. IGHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.63% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDR and IGHG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDR vs. IGHG — Risk / Return Rank
TLDR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGHG
TLDR vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLDR | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLDR vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.05%, smaller than the maximum IGHG drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and IGHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDR | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -25.16% | +25.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.49% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -2.28% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility
TLDR vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDR | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41% | 3.36% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 5.01% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 7.32% | -6.91% |
TLDR vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLDR vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison
TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than IGHG's 5.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.14% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDR and IGHG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.
IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 1.56% for TLDR.
TLDR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IGHG is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 0.30% for IGHG.
Find the right allocation for TLDR and IGHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer