PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDR vs. CNEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLDR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNEQ

1D
-0.91%
1M
11.24%
YTD
19.72%
6M
19.16%
1Y
49.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLDR and CNEQ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDR vs. CNEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLDR

CNEQ
CNEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CNEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CNEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLDRCNEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.82

1.51

+7.31

Drawdowns

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.05%, smaller than the maximum CNEQ drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and CNEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDRCNEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-27.58%

+27.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.91%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-4.89%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

Volatility

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDRCNEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39%

22.51%

-22.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

26.62%

-26.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

26.62%

-26.23%

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNEQ's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLDR vs. CNEQ - Dividend Comparison

TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than CNEQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CNEQ
Alger Concentrated Equity ETF
0.44%0.52%0.16%
TLDR
The Laddered T-Bill ETF
1.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLDR and CNEQ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CNEQ.

TLDR has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.44% for CNEQ.

TLDR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CNEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 0.55% for CNEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDR and CNEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer