TLDR vs. CLIP
TLDR (The Laddered T-Bill ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. TLDR is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLDR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.
Performance
TLDR vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLDR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLDR vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.23% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDR and CLIP is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDR vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank
TLDR
CLIP
TLDR vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLDR | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.54 | 10.71 | -2.17 |
Drawdowns
TLDR vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.05%, smaller than the maximum CLIP drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and CLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDR | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.08% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.00% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
TLDR vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDR | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40% | 0.23% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 0.44% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 0.44% | -0.04% |
TLDR vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLDR vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison
TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than CLIP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.91% | 4.14% | 5.11% | 2.75% |
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDR and CLIP have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TLDR.
CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.22% for TLDR.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 0.07% for CLIP.
Find the right allocation for TLDR and CLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer