PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDR vs. ATCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDR vs. ATCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLDR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
6M
1.76%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ATCL

1D
0.62%
1M
0.73%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$407.20K$547.21K$849.08K
$4.55M$2.20M$886.93K

TLDR vs. ATCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLDR and ATCL is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDR vs. ATCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLDR vs. ATCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLDR vs. ATCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.06%, smaller than the maximum ATCL drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and ATCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDRATCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-6.08%

+6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.10%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.73%

+0.72%

Volatility

TLDR vs. ATCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDRATCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42%

7.71%

-7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.42%

7.71%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.42%

7.71%

-7.29%

TLDR vs. ATCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ATCL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLDR vs. ATCL - Dividend Comparison

TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than ATCL's 5.72% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLDR and ATCL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ATCL.

ATCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 1.76% for TLDR.

TLDR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ATCL is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 0.65% for ATCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDR and ATCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer