TLCI vs. BUFI
TLCI (Touchstone International Equity ETF) and BUFI (AB International Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Touchstone, while BUFI is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TLCI returned -0.25% vs 12.80% for BUFI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLCI charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BUFI.
Performance
TLCI vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLCI achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than BUFI's 4.92% return.
TLCI
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- -0.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLCI vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLCI Touchstone International Equity ETF | -0.42% | 3.99% |
BUFI AB International Buffer ETF | 4.92% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLCI and BUFI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TLCI and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLCI vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank
TLCI
BUFI
TLCI vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLCI | BUFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.26 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 8.98 | -9.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLCI | BUFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 1.53 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.50 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
TLCI vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLCI drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLCI and BUFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLCI | BUFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -7.43% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -5.69% | -6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -0.32% | -4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -0.86% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 1.43% | +2.39% |
Volatility
TLCI vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) at 2.20%. This indicates that TLCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLCI | BUFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 2.20% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 7.05% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 8.43% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 9.15% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 9.15% | +6.60% |
TLCI vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLCI has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLCI vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison
TLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BUFI AB International Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLCI Touchstone International Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLCI and BUFI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLCI has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to BUFI (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLCI dropped -12.15% vs BUFI's -7.43%.
On 1-year performance, BUFI leads with 12.80% vs -0.25% for TLCI. On fees, TLCI is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, BUFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFI has performed better with a 12.80% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLCI is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.
TLCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.
TLCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TLCI and 0.69% for BUFI.
BUFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLCI and BUFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer