TLA vs. TLTX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.

Performance

TLA vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TLA

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -7.40%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TLTX

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -3.51%
• 6M: -2.90%
• YTD: -3.11%
• 1Y: -0.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	$81.43K	$70.64K	$69.71K
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	$202.98K	$200.23K	$333.11K

TLA vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	-2.43%
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	-2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TLA and TLTX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.08

Return for Risk

TLA vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLTX

TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 9
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLA vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLA	TLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.00	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.08	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.17	—

Drawdowns

TLA vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and TLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLA	TLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.80%	-6.70%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.79%	-6.70%	-2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-2.49%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLA	TLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	9.44%	+7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	9.44%	+7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	9.44%	+7.19%

TLA vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLA vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, less than TLTX's 19.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	8.86%	0.00%
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	19.30%	7.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLA and TLTX in my portfolio?

TLA and TLTX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TLA or TLTX?

On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLA or TLTX?

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLA or TLTX?

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.30%, compared with 8.86% for TLA.

What is the main difference between TLA and TLTX?

TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.29% for TLTX.