TLA vs. PBP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TLA is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

TLA vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TLA

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 17.18%
• 3Y*: 11.22%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: 7.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLA vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	3.78%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TLA and PBP is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

TLA vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 81
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLA vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLA	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.34	+0.47

Drawdowns

TLA vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLA	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-43.43%	+37.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-1.05%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-6.69%	+5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLA	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.42%	6.95%	+7.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	11.86%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.42%	13.66%	+0.76%

TLA vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLA vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than PBP's 11.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.26%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	6.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLA and PBP in my portfolio?

TLA and PBP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TLA or PBP?

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLA or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLA or PBP?

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.26%, compared with 6.55% for TLA.

What is the main difference between TLA and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.29% for PBP.