TLA vs. NVD
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.49 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.
Performance
TLA vs. NVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NVD
- 1D
- -5.85%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- 6M
- -25.85%
- YTD
- -30.21%
- 1Y
- -45.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -78.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $448.34M | $392.73M | $345.88M | |
| $81.43K | $70.64K | $69.71K |
TLA vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | -2.43% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -30.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and NVD is -0.49, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | -0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVD
TLA vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLA | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLA vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and NVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.80% | -99.26% | +87.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -59.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -99.06% | +90.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -82.49% | +80.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 33.25% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 73.16% | -56.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 92.05% | -75.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 92.05% | -75.42% |
TLA vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, less than NVD's 16.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 16.95% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 8.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and NVD have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLA is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLA is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 16.95%, compared with 8.86% for TLA.
TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 1.50% for NVD.
Find the right allocation for TLA and NVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer