TLA vs. NVD
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.
Performance
TLA vs. NVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD
- 1D
- 12.47%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -29.37%
- 6M
- -33.41%
- 1Y
- -65.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 3.78% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -33.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and NVD is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
NVD
TLA vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLA | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -0.87 | +1.68 |
Drawdowns
TLA vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and NVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -99.26% | +93.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -71.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -99.05% | +97.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -81.70% | +80.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.00% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 69.67% | -55.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 92.81% | -78.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 92.81% | -78.39% |
TLA vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than NVD's 16.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 16.74% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and NVD have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLA is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLA is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 16.74%, compared with 6.55% for TLA.
TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 1.50% for NVD.
Find the right allocation for TLA and NVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer