TLA vs. GOOP
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and GOOP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOP.
Performance
TLA vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOP
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 84.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.62% |
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and GOOP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GOOP
TLA vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLA | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLA vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and GOOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -27.49% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -11.44% | +11.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -6.44% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 29.27% | -14.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 26.32% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 26.32% | -11.89% |
TLA vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, less than GOOP's 12.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 12.56% | 11.79% | 13.73% | 2.06% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 8.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and GOOP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.
GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 12.56%, compared with 8.10% for TLA.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.99% for GOOP.
Find the right allocation for TLA and GOOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer