TLA vs. BAR
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). TLA is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.
Performance
TLA vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAR
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 3.78% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | -12.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and BAR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
BAR
TLA vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLA | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.87 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
TLA vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum BAR drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and BAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -21.53% | +16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -20.05% | +18.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -6.46% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 26.69% | -12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 17.97% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 16.42% | -2.00% |
TLA vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and BAR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.
TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.17% for BAR.
Find the right allocation for TLA and BAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer