PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLA vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLA vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLA

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
-0.35%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLA vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLA and ACII is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLA vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLA vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLAACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

-4.79

+5.60

Drawdowns

TLA vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-1.27%

-4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-1.15%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-0.61%

-0.73%

Volatility

TLA vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

7.74%

+6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

7.74%

+6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

7.74%

+6.68%

TLA vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLA vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLA and ACII have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.

TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLA and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer