TLA vs. ACII
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACII.
Performance
TLA vs. ACII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | -1.76% |
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and ACII is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLA | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -4.79 | +5.60 |
Drawdowns
TLA vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and ACII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -1.27% | -4.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.15% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -0.61% | -0.73% |
Volatility
TLA vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 7.74% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 7.74% | +6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 7.74% | +6.68% |
TLA vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.74% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and ACII have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.
TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.79% for ACII.
Find the right allocation for TLA and ACII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer