PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJUN vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TJUN vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUN achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -5.55% return.


TJUN

1D
-3.88%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.01%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGLD

1D
-1.96%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-8.37%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUN vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TJUN and IGLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TJUN vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUN
TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUN vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TJUNIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

0.68

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

1.94

+11.17

TJUN vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUN and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TJUN vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUN drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum IGLD drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUN and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TJUNIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-21.90%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.47%

-21.90%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-21.20%

+17.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-5.37%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

7.68%

-6.64%

Volatility

TJUN vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is 4.01%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that TJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TJUNIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

8.14%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

22.34%

-15.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

24.40%

-16.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

15.48%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

15.30%

-6.97%

TJUN vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TJUN vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
19.29%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TJUN and IGLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLD has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to TJUN (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUN dropped -4.47% vs IGLD's -21.90%.

On 1-year performance, IGLD leads with 14.83% vs 13.53% for TJUN. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

TJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TJUN and 0.85% for IGLD.

TJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TJUN and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer