TJUL vs. PJAN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) and PJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while PJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index. TJUL is actively managed, while PJAN is passively managed. Over the past year, TJUL returned 5.97% vs 14.92% for PJAN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

TJUL vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than PJAN's 5.32% return.

TJUL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.20%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJAN

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUL vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	2.20%	6.55%	8.18%	3.05%
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	5.32%	11.29%	13.45%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and PJAN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2023	0.74

The correlation between TJUL and PJAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TJUL vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL

TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 68
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PJAN

PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 81
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TJUL	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.58	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.80	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.55	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.24	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	17.28	-3.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TJUL vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and PJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TJUL	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.58	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	0.90	+0.75

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum PJAN drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and PJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUL	PJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-21.25%	+16.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.08%	-4.63%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-0.08%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-1.73%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.87%	-0.42%

Volatility

TJUL vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 0.51%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUL	PJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	1.05%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.15%	4.71%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77%	5.80%	-3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.26%	8.93%	-4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.26%	10.60%	-6.34%

TJUL vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TJUL and PJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

TJUL vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither TJUL nor PJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUL and PJAN in my portfolio?

TJUL and PJAN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUL or PJAN?

PJAN has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to TJUL (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs PJAN's -21.25%.

Which ETF is better, TJUL or PJAN?

On 1-year performance, PJAN leads with 14.92% vs 5.97% for TJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUL or PJAN?

Over the 1-year period, PJAN has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUL or PJAN?

TJUL and PJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUL or PJAN?

TJUL and PJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TJUL and PJAN?

TJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while PJAN is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.