PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJUL vs. XUSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TJUL vs. XUSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TJUL vs. XUSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
-0.49%6.55%8.18%3.05%
XUSP
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF
-6.15%18.27%30.60%4.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly higher than XUSP's -6.15% return.


TJUL

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
0.26%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XUSP

1D
0.95%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
-6.15%
6M
-4.59%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TJUL vs. XUSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TJUL and XUSP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

TJUL vs. XUSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL
TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XUSP
XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. XUSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TJULXUSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.52

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.70

5.92

+0.78

TJUL vs. XUSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the XUSP Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and XUSP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TJULXUSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.78

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and XUSP is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TJUL vs. XUSP - Dividend Comparison

Neither TJUL nor XUSP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. XUSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum XUSP drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and XUSP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TJULXUSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-22.59%

+17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-12.76%

+8.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-8.39%

+7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-4.57%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

3.27%

-2.53%

Volatility

TJUL vs. XUSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 1.41%, while Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TJULXUSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

6.40%

-4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

12.52%

-10.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

21.17%

-15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.36%

19.36%

-15.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

19.36%

-15.00%